|
|
|
I think that to improve the colonisation process, the landmasses should be named. I don't have any names yet, but still all the large landmasses should have names.
A 3/4 majority of the nations currently in the landmass must agree to the name. The landmass names will be on the map.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
, |
 |
|
|
|
<img src='http://www.thirdgeek.com/maps/ao/land/2005/12/06/' border='0' alt='AO Landmasses' />
<b>White Region</b>
3 Members must agree to a name with ZERO votes against.
(Glassed Tachbe can only ABSTAIN)
<b>Blue Region</b>
5 Members must agree to the name with ONE vote against.
(Arh....AM can only vote AGAINST) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
, |
|
|
|
|
| QUOTE (Vilita @ May 28 2004, 02:03 PM) |
White Region
3 Members must agree to a name with ZERO votes against.
(Glassed Tachbe can only OBSTAIN)
Blue Region
5 Members must agree to the name with ONE vote against.
(Arh....AM can only vote AGAINST) |
Well, my idea was that in a region with 3 nations in it, the vote would have to be unanimous. And I think that the nameless regions should be referred to by color.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
, |
|
|
|
|
| QUOTE (Stralphi @ May 28 2004, 04:29 PM) |
Well, my idea was that in a region with 3 nations in it, the vote would have to be unanimous. And I think that the nameless regions should be referred to by color. |
Well if you are referring to your region, there are 5 Nations in it. One, However, is Glassed Tachbe, who being absent from the region, has no vote, so must abstain, but is still a recognized occupied territory. So there goes Unanimous. Samonina and yourself are active, so theres 2; Salmantic is away and will only check back sporadically and Ostya only signs on when we ask him to, so I hope that clears up the reasoning behind 3 (1+1+.5+.5+0) = 3; with ZERO votes against. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
, |
|
|
|
|
| QUOTE (Vilita @ May 28 2004, 03:35 PM) | | QUOTE (Stralphi @ May 28 2004, 04:29 PM) |
Well, my idea was that in a region with 3 nations in it, the vote would have to be unanimous. And I think that the nameless regions should be referred to by color. |
Well if you are referring to your region, there are 5 Nations in it. One, However, is Glassed Tachbe, who being absent from the region, has no vote, so must abstain, but is still a recognized occupied territory. So there goes Unanimous. Samonina and yourself are active, so theres 2; Salmantic is away and will only check back sporadically and Ostya only signs on when we ask him to, so I hope that clears up the reasoning behind 3 (1+1+.5+.5+0) = 3; with ZERO votes against.
|
I was actually referring to the yellow region, which has 4 nations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
, |
|
|
|
|
| QUOTE (Stralphi @ May 29 2004, 10:42 AM) | | QUOTE (Vilita @ May 28 2004, 03:35 PM) | | QUOTE (Stralphi @ May 28 2004, 04:29 PM) |
Well, my idea was that in a region with 3 nations in it, the vote would have to be unanimous. And I think that the nameless regions should be referred to by color. |
Well if you are referring to your region, there are 5 Nations in it. One, However, is Glassed Tachbe, who being absent from the region, has no vote, so must abstain, but is still a recognized occupied territory. So there goes Unanimous. Samonina and yourself are active, so theres 2; Salmantic is away and will only check back sporadically and Ostya only signs on when we ask him to, so I hope that clears up the reasoning behind 3 (1+1+.5+.5+0) = 3; with ZERO votes against.
|
I was actually referring to the yellow region, which has 4 nations
|
The yellow region is too large to be named at this point. less than 50% of the land is occupied, even if there were 12 nations taking the same amount of space, it would remain nameless until at least 2/3rds of the land was covered. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
, |
|
|
|
|
| QUOTE (Vilita @ May 29 2004, 12:05 PM) | | The yellow region is too large to be named at this point. less than 50% of the land is occupied, even if there were 12 nations taking the same amount of space, it would remain nameless until at least 2/3rds of the land was covered. |
Oh, okay. That makes sense. Although if 12 nations took the same amount of space, I think that some of the nations would be annexing. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
, |
|
|
|
|
|
So, you want my land mass to be named when more people arrive? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
, |
|
|
|
|
I think the cyan region has enough covered now to be named.
EDIT: Cool! 50 posts!
This post has been edited by Krytenia on Jun 23 2004, 09:41 AM |
 |
 |
|
Krytenia |
|
Now With Added Bekk! |
 |
|
|
|
Posts: 661 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
, |
|
|
|
|
|
With 7 nations occupying the yellow bit of the mis-spelled archipeligo (plus myself and NEWI informally naming the lake 'Bekk') I think that the Yellow Continent should now be named. Any suggestions? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
, |
|
|
|
|
|
I don't see any objkections to the lake being called Bekk. I also see no rason why there is a 'k' on objections or there is not an 'e' in reason, but that's a story for a different day. I propose the Yellow Continent be called Marligantis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
, |
|
|
|
|
|
My suggestion for the blue continent - "Southaven" |
|
|
 |
|
Xile |
|
Punch-Drunk Psychosis |
|
|
|
|
|
Posts: 358 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
, |
|
|
|
, |
|
|
|
|
|
Hmm...the yellow continent looks like Quebec...I'll get back to you on that one. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
, |
|
|
|
|
| QUOTE (Aquiliana @ Aug 18 2004, 07:52 PM) | | Hmm...the yellow continent looks like Quebec...I'll get back to you on that one. |
Anything French-inspired immediately loses my vote  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
, |
|
Track this topic
Receive email notification when a reply has been made to this topic and you are not active on the board.
Subscribe to this forum
Receive email notification when a new topic is posted in this forum and you are not active on the board.
Download / Print this Topic
Download this topic in different formats or view a printer friendly version.
[ Script Execution time: 0.0218 ] [ 13 queries used ] [ GZIP Enabled ]
|
Close Topic Options
